The Breast

Miyamoto Yuriko


The Breast: A movement that cannot be imprisoned
ayepizmedina@middlebury.edu
  Miyamoto Yuriko, a notable writer who faced incarceration herself for supporting the proletarian movement along with her husband, appears to have expressed some of her personal life in “The Breast”. As she had done with other short stories, “The Breast”  written in 1935, addresses Japan’s class inequality and proletarian sentiments during a time when ... read more

 

Miyamoto Yuriko, a notable writer who faced incarceration herself for supporting the proletarian movement along with her husband, appears to have expressed some of her personal life in “The Breast”. As she had done with other short stories, “The Breast”  written in 1935, addresses Japan’s class inequality and proletarian sentiments during a time when labor unionists and activists were being incarcerated for fighting and working toward changing the political system that favored the bourgeois. This story is centered around Hiroko, a woman who works at a daycare center while at the same time being involved with a union group in order to make progress for a more egalitarian quality of life for the working class. Even after Hiroko had been let go from incarceration for being involved previously, she continued to work toward this goal by speaking at a union meeting and advocating for the cause to the parents of the children in the daycare center. The reader gets a glimpse of what Hiroko’s day to day life is like, which includes her visits to her husband, Fukagawa Jukichi, who is incarcerated for involvement with the proletariat movement, as well as how she interacts with other fellow workers, and what working in the daycare is like. I personally had no attachments to any of the characters, but seeing as the reader receives the perspective of Hiroko, the readers can definitely see the struggles of a woman involved with the proletariat cause during a time when it was extremely risky in a realistic manner. Miyamoto definitely portrayed how some women at that time may have felt as if they had no voice, or the struggles with the role of motherhood implied within the text, but her very imagery-filled writing nevertheless places the reader’s perspective in a very convincing snippet of someone’s life. I would recommend this to readers seeking to learn more about women involved with the proletariat movement or for those seeking for proletariat sympathizing texts. Those outside of that might not find the text as engaging but still an interesting story overall.

Miyamoto Yuriko,  “The Breast”  Repression, Recantation and Socialist Realism, trans. Heather Bowen (Central Review April, 1935), 364-393.

Total Votes : 1 Vote Up Edit Reply


swittig@middlebury.edu
The ending of the story makes me question what Hiroko was planning to do in reaction to Tamino's arrest. It seems as though she was anticipating arrest or trouble herself by entrusting Juukichi's jacket with Ogura. Was she planning to do anything at all or was she simply preparing for repercussions from her former actions?

gdevries@middlebury.edu
Daily Question 3/2: The only reference to a woman's breast in this story is when Hiroko opens her blouse to feed a crying baby. He does not latch and is only comforted when Ohana, a nursing woman, offers her own breast. It is said that the sorrow and outrage of women in society is could be found in this image of Ohana breastfeeding her malnourished baby. Is this perhaps commentary on the way that young female activists were "sucked into the roles of secretary or housekeeper as a matter of expedience"?

alinas@middlebury.edu
It's incredible that despite all the harassment and time in prison Miyamoto Yoriko did not abandon her values or belief in her cause and that her writings displayed controlled emotion and not anger or resentment. I wonder what made her so steadfast in her ideas and convictions no matter how she was persecuted for them?

nquizon@middlebury.edu
How did Miyamoto Yuriko's middle class upbringing, coming from a father who was a Cambridge-trained architect, affect criticism of her and her work from the different Communist movements? Compared to Sata Ineko, it seems as though she had a much more privileged upbringing at first glance.

nlara@middlebury.edu
  1. Miyamoto Yuriko's beliefs of Communism were so strong that not even prison was able to break her. How are the aspects of her beliefs embedded in her literary works?

mgromero@middlebury.edu
I also had a similar question regarding Miyamoto Yuriko’s upbringing and how accurate was it. I am curious if there is any information as to how she first became acquainted with the Communist Movement and how she wrestled with her own upbringing and life in her writing. Can those who benefit from capitalism write about the struggles of those who suffer from capitalism accurately? Should they?

jayhoc@middlebury.edu
Sort of a tangent, but was Miyamoto Yuriko persecuted during this time since the government started cracking down on Communism? Furthermore, why was Kobayashi Takiji's death the "death knell" for the movement?

sgregory@middlebury.edu
Hiroko seems to be a woman who defies the duties and responsibilities typical of a women during the time, so much so that she ignores men's comments and is a very independent woman. From this point I am wondering how she developed such a strong belief in communism as it seems like it goes against her independent nature and defiance as a woman during her time?
 

egavin@middlebury.edu
What is the "realist" part of socialist realism? I understand socialism, but I do not really understand what realism is or how it works into socialism. Furthermore, where does the inspiration of socialism come from in Japan? Given that the U.S. played a large role in the dismantling of the traditional Japanese political structure, why was a socialist/proletariat system seemingly more popular in "The Breast" than a more capitalist system?

rurbina@middlebury.edu
Daily Question 3/2: "The Breast" is a title that is out there. It isn't, from my understanding, a title used to appeal to readers. However because of this, Hiroko had to understand the effects this would have on their readers as well as her credibility. So i was wondering, did the public perceive the title as hostile? And what backlash did Hiroko face?

sabrinak@middlebury.edu
Daily Question 3/2: Adding on to Claudia's thought, is the article called "The Breast" because there are many references to Hioroko's character? For example, she has not had children yet, but she is running a childcare center.

ayepizmedina@middlebury.edu
Do you think that her strong belief in communism was rooted in Yuriko's defiant nature or did communism make her a defiant and independent woman?

mmflores@middlebury.edu
I was interested to see the level of detail of the behind-the-scenes work of the movement depicted in "The Breast". I am wondering what type of backlash did Hiroko received from not only writing a book that challenge the status quo but represented how independent women can be?


ayepizmedina@middlebury.edu

Karlsson, M. “The Proletarian Literature Movement: Japan’s First Encounter with Working-Class Literature.” Class Literature(s): Historical and International Perspectives. Volume 2. (2020) Pp. 115–137 https://doi.org/10.16993/bbf.e   

“The Proletarian Literature Movement: Japan’s First Encounter with Working-Class Literature” is a peer reviewed chapter from a book about understanding working class literature from various places around the world. This chapter specifically focuses on proletariat literature in Japan during the late 1920s featuring snippets of literature written by the working class in Japan and a brief description of Karlsson’s thoughts on it. It emphasizes[MO1]  the importance of literature during labor movements stating that literature was the most influential form for spreading the proletariat’s sentiments. This chapter also includes “origins of the initiative to create a “proletarian” literature in Japan” during the Proletarian Cultural Movement which occurred in the late 1920s. This Proletarian Cultural Movement’s mission was to “create a more equal society,” however its leaders and union activist took it as “means to propagate their ideology and pave the way for union activism.” Karlsson then contrasts the writers in the movement who essentially wanted to write their way into union activism with those who were in fact union activists. Additionally, the author notes the presence of female writers who were a part of the trade union movement in Japan and wrote about the bad conditions and hardships other women faced in the workforce which garnered attention from other international communist movements. [MO2] Karlsson then transitions into stories from female writers writing for the proletariat cause and the effect these texts have now on present day Japan with its message of solidarity for the working class. This places “The Breast” (1935) by Miyamoto Yuriko (dates) in a more historical perspective and, by reading this chapter, the reader can pick up its message from a women writer’s point of view in Japan and gain some background knowledge on the subject of working-class literature and its impact on the movements at the time.

 

Keene, Donald. “Japanese Literature and Politics in the 1930s.” Journal of Japanese Studies 2, no. 2 (1976) 225-248. https://doi.org/10.2307/132053

In this article, Keene explains the reasoning behind why some writers during this time period decided to dedicate their literature to proletarian and communist causes. He argues that some drift to these Marxist ideologies due to their personal experience with poverty or hardships, but he also offers a more critical perspective, by stating that some of these writers were people who wanted to “become a part of  a cause larger than themselves.”( 225) The author then moves on to explore why some of these writers and activists eventually abandoned their Marxist ideology. Whether they were forced to, or they had become disillusioned with it, many writers experienced tenkō or ideological conversion. Some stories feature some writers who became stronger advocates for the proletariat cause in their writing even after the repercussions of writing such texts and having “renounced” their Marxist beliefs, while other stories had former proletarian writers that had “swung so far left, they went right.” This article emphasizes the relation between Marxism and Japanese culture, as well as the writers’ struggles with censorship and borrowed ideology. Although no Japanese women proletariat writers are featured in Keene’s analysis, the article nevertheless provides a view of the writers’ purpose and intent of their writing, given that Miyamoto Yuriko dealt with similar repercussions in 1933. Was she writing with the intent to improve Japanese society, or was she one of the writers that simply wanted to be a part of something greater is a question worth asking regarding her work.

 

 

 

 

Yoon, Shomi. “Women and the Early Years of Japanese Communism.” International Socialist Organization Aotearoa, April 4, 2020. https://iso.org.nz/2014/07/08/women-and-the-early-years-of-japanese-communism/.  

This blog shares some personal accounts of a few women who were a part of a small group that took part in the May Day protests in Japan that aimed to “overthrow capitalism for genuine women’s liberation.” This small group of women was called the “Sekirankai” or the “Red Wave Society” and was formed because women could not formally participate in political socialist groups. Yoon also noted some of the historical factors such as the Meiji restoration values, which lasted from the late 1860s to late 1880s, that contributed to women seeking to participate in socialist movements in order to fight the ideology of women solely having the purpose of being “good wives” and “wise mothers.” Some of the personal accounts featured in this blog included some differences even within this collection of women and their own interpretation of liberation under a socialist society. Lastly, it highlights the small victories the group did achieve despite its short-lived existence and what led to its disbandment. Overall, this blog showcases the unshakable attitude of women during these protests and provides some contexts that led to these escalations in situations similar to that of “The Breast.” Additionally, it offered a more resilient tone which contrasts that of the helpless tone in “The Breast” and gives the readers the impression that these women’s efforts were not all in vain.

 

 Zhou, Zhijun. “The Transformation of Women in Views of Socialist Japan.” Synergy, April 25, 2018. https://utsynergyjournal.org/2017/10/12/the-transformation-of-women-in-views-of-socialist-japan/.

 

This article begins by emphasizing how gender and class are important subjects in Marxist thought and focuses on how Japanese women were changing their role in society by challenging “traditional social relations in Japan” by participating in these proletariat movements that allowed them to step out of their traditional roles. Zhou then brings in literature such as Women: The Longest Revolution by Juliet Mitchell and discusses how its overall message highlights the “marginalization of women in political, social, and economic aspects while at the same time being an essential part of society.” The author brings in other literary examples such as Engels’s The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State, which states that women's liberation starts with joining the workforce and denotes the difference between socialist perspective and socialism.  Zhou then discusses three different aspects of the transformation of women in socialist Japan. The first refers to women who lived in rural areas and married Marxist supporters, thus coming to see the hardships workers endured and to more easily accept Marxist views. The second dealt with women’s reproductive freedom and its tie to overcoming capitalism. Lastly, there was the mobilization of women which gave them the opportunity for “greater participation in social labor and political affairs.” Zhou does not simply praise these transformations, but rather raises questions such as whether the involvement in these movements by women, married to Marxist supporters, was “deemed another patriarchal influence on women,” or if women joining the workforce was benefiting capitalists in the end. These are all very important themes that relate a lot to those of “The Breast,” seeing as the main protagonist deals with a lot of these transformations. It evaluates these transformations and presents theory versus practice in a more easy to understand context.