The Land of Heart's Desire

Hara Tamiki


Hara Tamiki's Suicide Note: Death as Fulfillment
ejkim@middlebury.edu
*The novel, The Crazy Iris (1994), by Kenzaburō Ōe (1935-) is a compilation of stories from survivors of the atomic bombings in Hiroshima and Nagasaki on August 6, 1945. My book review focuses on one of the stories, “The Land of Heart’s Desire.” This story was written by Hara Tamiki six years after the calamity. ... read more

*The novel, The Crazy Iris (1994), by Kenzaburō Ōe (1935-) is a compilation of stories from survivors of the atomic bombings in Hiroshima and Nagasaki on August 6, 1945. My book review focuses on one of the stories, “The Land of Heart’s Desire.” This story was written by Hara Tamiki six years after the calamity.

“The Land of Heart’s Desire” is a short story written by a Japanese hibakusha writer, Hara Tamiki (1905-1951), who is both the main character and narrator. Throughout the story, he appears to be more than distraught by the effects of the bombing in Hiroshima. The entire story focuses on his sensory input and is written in a way that seems like a daydream. The blur of emotions and senses throw him from one thought to another. Because he jumps from one idea of feeling and memory to another, the style of writing conveys the message in a distraught manner—almost as if the reader is experiencing dizziness. Furthermore, Hara’s story reveals an interesting artistic development, which may be seen as one that coevolves with his intensifying struggle to deal with the psychological after-effects of the Hiroshima experience. The bomb experience, in fact, plays a central role in the course followed by Hara’s life—his suicide by lying in the path of an oncoming train near Kichijō Station in Tokyo.

Although his death is often attributed to depression over the outbreak of the Korean War, Hara’s later writings clearly reveal a mind that feels increasingly threatened by insanity. This threat of insanity is partly the result of a sense of severe isolation. Hara writes that he has “reached the depths of human loneliness. There is no longer a scrap of straw to cling to in this world” (56). There is no doubt this frightening sense of isolation was enhanced, if not created, by his obsessive memory of the Hiroshima experience; Hara clearly portrays a profound link between his suicide and the experience of the atomic bomb.

I especially enjoyed how Hara used temperature to convey this stress in an engaging way. The short story begins with him describing the chirping of the birds and how receptive they would be to his presence if he were to join them in his next life. Since this is in relation to the aftermath of the bomb, I infer that such thoughts of reincarnation are hope that his passed loved ones are in a safe space now; perhaps he wants to connect with them and speak to them. This supposed hope, however, is barely hopeful in tone and presentation.

The narrator proceeds to explain how nature would take his place. “The stars in the night sky that hang so unconcernedly canopied over my head, and the forms of the trees standing so aloof from me here below, as though eventually to take my place” (56). The negative connotation is present throughout. The irrelevance of his life, and how attention is drawn to how life will continue without him, unfortunately, ends the work on a sad note. However, I found it a bit difficult to clearly discern whether or not the narrator wants to give up on life and become a part of nature.

All in all, I would highly recommend “The Land of Heart’s Desire” to anyone interested in reading a different perspective of the atomic bombings in Japan—one that is not akin to the U.S.-centric position we often gain exposure to. In just eight pages, I think Hara well-conveyed his sudden confusion of purpose, along with the feeling of potentially being victimized by the bombing that occurred years before. While the final impression of the story is of utter tranquility, of death as a release, it was interesting to see Hara’s death as an illumination that he himself cast on his writings. The death he freely chose becomes one of the finishing touches to his work. I would definitely read it again, as I regard it as one of the most hauntingly beautiful works of modern Japanese literature, albeit the most difficult to stomach.

Total Votes : 0 Vote Up Edit Reply


ejkim@middlebury.edu
Liam Wynne (11/30): Does the narrator's constant comparisons of his current state to the horrors he experienced at Hiroshima reflect the inescapable fallout of the bombing that lingers not only in physical ailments but mentally as well?

ejkim@middlebury.edu
 

Cynthia Ramos (11/30): Who is the girl U to the narrator?


ejkim@middlebury.edu
 

Erin Kim (12/13): Are there any differences in Tamiki Hara’s writing style when compared to other writers who experienced similar events during the bombings? Hara seems a bit more descriptive when retelling the story, while some of the other Hibakusha authors are a little more analytical. Could this pose a difference in the author's experiences?


xiyaoh@middlebury.edu
The style of narration adopts a stream of consciousness that seems rather fragmented and distorted than flowing smoothly. What does this particular way of writing suggest about the protagonist's mentality

mkemmer@middlebury.edu
Does the stream of consciousness narration reflect the narrator's ongoing fractured, lingering thoughts about the events of Hiroshima? What is effect of this narrative style?


ejkim@middlebury.edu

Day, Matthew. “Reading Atomic Bomb Literature as a Source of Truth.” Bulletin of Tokyo Denki University, Arts and Sciences, no. 15 (2017): 55-62. Accessed December 11, 2020. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/234563737.pdf

This source underscores the importance and relevance of atomic bomb literature in understanding the tragedies of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Day argues that “[the] alloy of subjective histories, memories, and personal beliefs” (55) can bring about biases and further detract the historical truth of the aforementioned calamity. This source emphasizes the importance of Japanese war literature when studying the history of the atomic bombings. Furthermore, Day analyzes a few pieces written by Hara Tamiki and concludes by saying, “the fact that writers are trying to transmit an experience should not be underestimated” (56). 

 


ejkim@middlebury.edu

 

Hara, Tamiki. “The Land of Heart’s Desire.” In The Crazy Iris: And Other Stories of the Atomic Aftermath, by Kenzaburo Ōe, 55-62. New York: Grove Press, 1994.


ejkim@middlebury.edu

Treat, John Whittier. “Hiroshima and the Place of the Narrator.” The Journal of Asian Studies, Vol. 48, no. 1 (1989): 29-49. Accessed December 11, 2020. 

This source circles around A-bomb writer, Ōta Yōko (1903-63), and reveals her physical and psychological problems that have “all arisen from her presence at Hiroshima’s destruction” (29). Treat goes on to express Ōta’s difficulty with trying to convey and describe her A-bomb experiences, and mentions it is not possible to do so with “a conventional view of words” (31). Hara Tamiki is mentioned in the source as another A-bomb writer who “embraced similar skeptical views on a language inspired by...historical privilege” (31). This source details how the after-effects of the bombings “diminished powers of the writer” (31).

 


ejkim@middlebury.edu

Yoshida, Kayoko. "From Atomic Fragments to Memories of the Trinity Bomb: A Bridge of Oral History over the Pacific." The Oral History Review 30, no. 2 (2003): 59-75. Accessed December 12, 2020. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3675476.

This paper focuses on the film, “Memories of the Trinity Bomb, a Japanese documentary film based on the book, “Atomic Fragments: A Daughter’s Questions,” written by Mary Palevsky. Yoshida records Japanese perspectives on the film through interviews with Japanese viewers varying both in generation and background. She reveals common reactions of Japanese students’ lack of background knowledge of the atomic bomb because “oral history has not yet gained the degree of recognition in Japanese academia than it has in the United States” (13). Although Hara Tamiki isn’t mentioned at all, this paper is still relevant—as it explores the meaning of this trans-media as well as transnational collaboration on the topic of the atomic bomb.