The Land of Heart's Desire
Hara Tamiki
Cynthia Ramos (11/30): Who is the girl U to the narrator?
Erin Kim (12/13): Are there any differences in Tamiki Hara’s writing style when compared to other writers who experienced similar events during the bombings? Hara seems a bit more descriptive when retelling the story, while some of the other Hibakusha authors are a little more analytical. Could this pose a difference in the author's experiences?
Day, Matthew. “Reading Atomic Bomb Literature as a Source of Truth.” Bulletin of Tokyo Denki University, Arts and Sciences, no. 15 (2017): 55-62. Accessed December 11, 2020. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/234563737.pdf
This source underscores the importance and relevance of atomic bomb literature in understanding the tragedies of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Day argues that “[the] alloy of subjective histories, memories, and personal beliefs” (55) can bring about biases and further detract the historical truth of the aforementioned calamity. This source emphasizes the importance of Japanese war literature when studying the history of the atomic bombings. Furthermore, Day analyzes a few pieces written by Hara Tamiki and concludes by saying, “the fact that writers are trying to transmit an experience should not be underestimated” (56).
Hara, Tamiki. “The Land of Heart’s Desire.” In The Crazy Iris: And Other Stories of the Atomic Aftermath, by Kenzaburo Ōe, 55-62. New York: Grove Press, 1994.
Treat, John Whittier. “Hiroshima and the Place of the Narrator.” The Journal of Asian Studies, Vol. 48, no. 1 (1989): 29-49. Accessed December 11, 2020.
This source circles around A-bomb writer, Ōta Yōko (1903-63), and reveals her physical and psychological problems that have “all arisen from her presence at Hiroshima’s destruction” (29). Treat goes on to express Ōta’s difficulty with trying to convey and describe her A-bomb experiences, and mentions it is not possible to do so with “a conventional view of words” (31). Hara Tamiki is mentioned in the source as another A-bomb writer who “embraced similar skeptical views on a language inspired by...historical privilege” (31). This source details how the after-effects of the bombings “diminished powers of the writer” (31).
Yoshida, Kayoko. "From Atomic Fragments to Memories of the Trinity Bomb: A Bridge of Oral History over the Pacific." The Oral History Review 30, no. 2 (2003): 59-75. Accessed December 12, 2020. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3675476.
This paper focuses on the film, “Memories of the Trinity Bomb, a Japanese documentary film based on the book, “Atomic Fragments: A Daughter’s Questions,” written by Mary Palevsky. Yoshida records Japanese perspectives on the film through interviews with Japanese viewers varying both in generation and background. She reveals common reactions of Japanese students’ lack of background knowledge of the atomic bomb because “oral history has not yet gained the degree of recognition in Japanese academia than it has in the United States” (13). Although Hara Tamiki isn’t mentioned at all, this paper is still relevant—as it explores the meaning of this trans-media as well as transnational collaboration on the topic of the atomic bomb.